Skip to main content

OpenSciEd Unit 6.4 · Lesson 11

Evaluating Two Models

MS-ESS1-4MS-ESS2-1Assessment · Formative assessment

Assessment guide

How to read student work on this assessment — standards alignment, what strong understanding looks like, and common gaps.

Standards alignment

MS-ESS1-4MS-ESS2-1

What understanding looks like

Strong

  • The model that students draw on the first page of Evaluating Two Models is likely to represent a single large landmass, though that is not absolutely necessary. They should represent that at least most of the landmass are touching or adjacent to each other in a way that matches according to shape. Their diagram should include labeled regions representing each of the 7 land masses, and at least 3 or 4 different kinds of data represented graphically or with labeling. Look for data to be located near and across boundaries where land masses are next to each other. For responses to the written assessment questions, see Teacher Key for Evaluating Two Models for details.

Facilitation guidance from the lesson plan — what to notice in student thinking and how to respond while teaching.

What to look / listen for

The model that students draw on the first page of Evaluating Two Models is likely to represent a single large landmass, though that is not absolutely necessary. They should represent that at least most of the landmass are touching or adjacent to each other in a way that matches according to shape. Their diagram should include labeled regions representing each of the 7 land masses, and at least 3 or 4 different kinds of data represented graphically or with labeling. Look for data to be located near and across boundaries where land masses are next to each other. For responses to the written assessment questions, see Teacher Key for Evaluating Two Models for details.

What to do

There are multiple elements in the written answers to the assessment questions that would provide an adequate answer. Not every element must be present in a student answer for a question to be answered sufficiently. See Teacher Key for Evaluating Two Models for scoring guidance. If students have not included any of the listed elements in their answer, list possible elements for them to consider. Also, provide feedback to students on their written work and models that calls out any missing elements in order to bring these to students’ attention.

Materials

Last updated from official OpenSciEd on 7/1/2026

Student handout

6.4 Lesson 11 Assessment Evaluating Two Models.docx

Google Form

Digitized — add an editable copy to your Google Forms

Teacher guide

6.4 Lesson 11 Teacher Edition.docx

Answer key (recommended)

6.4 Lesson 11 Answer Key Teacher Key for.docx

Preview and export work with this Form, but Add to Eddo workspace needs a Forms API formId URL (not a published /d/e/ link). Use to copy available files to your Drive.

Evaluating Two Models | Eddo Learning Platform